To maintain the quality of the manuscript and avoid publishing / plagiarism violations in the publishing process, the editorial board establishes the ethics of scientific publication in the Creative Research Management Journal. The publication ethics refer to The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Duties and responsibilities of Editors
1. Publication decision
Based on the review report the editor has complete responsibility and authority to accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field. The Editor-in-Chief of Creative Research Management Journal is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
2. Review of Manuscripts
The Editor of Creative Research Management Journal must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the reviewer for originality, making use of appropriate software to do so.
The editor must ensure that each manuscript submitted to Creative Research Management Journal is double-blind reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, ethnic, political, citizenship, etc. of the authors.
Creative Research Management Journal protects the confidentiality of all individual data and information related to the publication. Creative Research Management Journal also guarantees the confidentiality of articles submitted to parties not related to the publication process
5. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
The editor of Creative Research Management Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his/her own research without written consent of the author.
Duties and responsibilities of Author
1. Reporting Standards
Authors must present an accurate article about the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers must present their results honestly and without cheating, falsification or improper manipulation of data. A manuscript must contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Manuscripts must follow new journal submissions.
2. Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that they have written original works. Manuscripts may not be submitted simultaneously to more than one publication. Relevant previous works and publications, whether by other researchers or those of the author, must be and are referred to as appropriate and appropriate.
3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
An author should not publish a manuscript describing the substance of the same research in more than one journal or main publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publication behavior.
4. Source recognition
Authors must acknowledge all data used in the research and publication citations that have influence in influencing the nature of the work reported. True recognition of the work of others must always be given.
5. Author of the article
Authors must build on those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation or interpretation of the reported research. Everyone who has made a significant contribution is registered as a partner. Other people who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. Authors for correspondence should ensure that all co-authors are appropriate and that no inappropriate co-authors are included in the article, and that all co-authors have viewed and revised the final version of the paper and have submitted their submissions for publication.
6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors must clearly disclose in their manuscripts any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be interpreted to influence the results or their interpretation of the text.
Duties and responsibilities of Reviewers
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
The Jurnal Manajemen uses a double-blind review process. Reviewer assists an editor in making editorial decisions and through communication of the editor with authors, a reviewer can also help authors improve the quality of work. Peer review is an essential part of formal scientific communication and has a central role in the scientific method. The task of the reviewer is critical, but also constructive assessment of the received manuscripts. He or she provides detailed and reasoned objections and suggestions related to the research and the way in which it is presented in the work. Reviewers are not responsible for communicating with authors.
Jurnal Manajemen is committed to review the author's articles in accordance with the specified time period. Reviewers will be given a period of time to review the article, if they cannot review within the specified time period, then the article will be transferred to another qualified reviewer.
Each submission received for review must be treated as a confidential document. It should not be shown or discussed it with other people except with the permission of the editor.
4. Standards of Objectivity
The reviewers should evaluate articles based on the content, provide recommendations for improvement, and clearly express their views and support them with arguments. The review comment should be respectful.
The reviewer should identify relevant articles which were not cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously published should be accompanied by a citation. Reviewers also need to alert editors to substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any published paper they are personally acquainted with.
6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Reviewer must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscript for their own research without the express written consent of the author. Confidential information or ideas obtained through the review process must remain confidential and should not be used for personal gain. Reviewers should not agree to review the manuscripts in which there is a conflict of interest because of competition, cooperation, or other relationships or connections with any author, company or institution associated with the work.