BIOKONVERSI LIMBAH PERTANIAN MENJADI BIOPESTISIDA RIZOBAKTERI ANTIFUNGAL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32663/ja.v23i2.5386

Keywords:

C/N ratio, circular economy, fusarium oxysporum, metabolite biosynthesis, rhizoengineering

Abstract

Modern agriculture faces increasing challenges from soil-borne fungal pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotium rolfsii, which cause severe root and wilt diseases and significantly reduce crop productivity. This study employed a qualitative–descriptive approach supported by controlled laboratory experiments to evaluate the potential of agricultural waste as an alternative, low-cost substrate for producing antifungal rhizobacterial biopesticides. Six types of agricultural waste—rice straw, rice husk, corn cob, sugarcane bagasse, coffee husk, and soybean residue—were assessed based on their C/N ratio, lignin content, biodegradability, and nutrient availability. The results indicated that substrates with moderate C/N ratios (15–25) and low lignin content, particularly soybean residue and sugarcane bagasse, promoted optimal rhizobacterial colonization, robust biofilm formation, and high production of antifungal metabolites such as chitinase and siderophores. Rhizobacteria cultured on soybean residue exhibited the strongest inhibition zone against Fusarium oxysporum (20.5 mm) and the highest plant protection efficacy (88%), with biopesticide stability maintained for up to 120 days. Two conceptual models, Substrate Structure Colonization (SSC) and Media Metabolite Effectiveness (MME), are proposed to explain the relationship between substrate structure, metabolite biosynthesis, and biopesticide performance. These findings provide a sustainable strategy for converting agricultural waste into high-value bio-based inputs, supporting circular economy practices and green agriculture initiatives.

References

Almeida, R. F., Santos, J. L., & Costa, M. A. (2024). Economic assessment of waste-based biopesticide production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 140223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140223

Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., & Liu, W. (2024). Soil microorganisms: their role in enhancing crop production and substrate-structured microbial growth. Diversity, 16(12), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120734

dos Reis, G. A., Martinez-Burgos, W. J., Pozzan, R., Pastrana Puche, Y., Ocan-Torres, D., Mota, P. Q. F., & Karp, S. G. (2024). Comprehensive review of microbial inoculants: agricultural applications, technology trends in patents, and regulatory frameworks. Sustainability, 16(19), 8720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198720

Ehinmitan, A. I., Bello, T. A., & Olaniran, A. O. (2024). BioSolutions for green agriculture: unveiling the diverse contributions of rhizobacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6181491. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6181491

Fenibo, E. O., & Matambo, T. (2025). Biopesticides for sustainable agriculture: feasible options for adopting cost-effective strategies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1657000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1657000

Food, & of the United Nations, A. O. (2023). Annual Report on Global Plant Health and Fungal Pathogen Impact.

Gu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, J. (2022). Effect of different biochar particle sizes together with bio-fertilizer on rhizosphere bacterial community and substrate structure in saline–alkali soils. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 949190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.949190

Haque, M. M., Sultana, T., & Lee, D. (2024). Rhizoengineering with biofilm-producing rhizobacteria to enhance crop performance. Heliyon, 10(3), e10307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e10307

Iqbal, M., Ullah, M. W., & Khan, S. (2024). Recent advances of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 5, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100125

Kaniz, F., Alam, M., & Rashid, M. H. (2023). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mediate soil hydro-physical processes: Implications for microbial colonization and substrate structure. Vadose Zone Journal, 22(4), e20274. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20274

Kumar, S., Patel, R., & Meena, V. S. (2024). Effect of moisture content on microbial growth kinetics and efficiency of solid-state fermentation. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118892

Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Substrate physicochemical properties regulate microbial colonization and metabolic activity. Applied Soil Ecology, 189, 104978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104978

López, M., García, J., & Fernández, C. (2020). Fermentation of coffee husk waste enhances rhizobacterial density and activity. Journal of Environmental Microbiology, 22(4), 1341–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/jem.14402

Martinez-Romero, E., Lopez-Guerrero, M., & Torres, A. (2025). Substrate pretreatment enhances antagonistic metabolite production by rhizobacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 109(4), 2231–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-025-12877-9

Oliveira, P. R., Mendes, L. F., & Araujo, R. (2024). Formulation strategies determine storage stability and field performance of microbial biopesticides. Biological Control, 190, 105482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105482

Rahman, A., Putra, D., & Lestari, S. (2023). Pesticide use behavior of horticultural farmers in Indonesia. Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia, 27(2), 85–94.

Rahman, M., Hossain, S., & Ahmed, T. (2023). Enhancing antifungal rhizobacterial activity using agro-industrial residues as culture media. Microbial Ecology and Biocontrol, 58(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517977.2023.114592

Rocha, R. P., Oliveira, F. C., & Mendes, J. P. (2024). Agricultural bioinputs obtained by solid-state fermentation: influence of substrate structure on microbial growth and metabolite production. Sustainability, 16(3), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031076

Singh, A., & Verma, P. (2022). Optimization of agricultural waste substrates for rhizobacterial growth and metabolite production. Journal of Applied Microbial Biotechnology, 45(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamb.2022.03.004

Song, Y., Wang, H., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Recent advances in employing plant rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 37, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2025.100215

Statistik, B. P. (2023). Statistik Produksi dan Pemanfaatan Limbah Pertanian Indonesia 2023.

Sun, W., Shahrajabian, M. H., & Soleymani, A. (2024). The roles of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-based biostimulants for agricultural production systems. Plants, 13(5), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050613

Wang, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Antimicrobial metabolites produced by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Bacillus and Pseudomonas. Microbiological Research, 272, 127123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2024.127123

Wu, Z., Chen, L., & Zhang, M. (2025). Biochar-supported microbial systems: a strategy for enhanced microbial colonization and bioconversion efficiency. Biochar, 7(1), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-025-00506-7

Zhang, Y., Li, W., & Chen, H. (2021). Pre-treatment of lignocellulosic waste to improve microbial growth and biofertilizer production. Bioresource Technology Reports, 16, 100892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100892

Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Chen, X. (2023). Moisture regulation and aerobic respiration of microorganisms in lignocellulosic substrates. Bioresource Technology, 369, 128356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128356

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

BIOKONVERSI LIMBAH PERTANIAN MENJADI BIOPESTISIDA RIZOBAKTERI ANTIFUNGAL. (2025). Jurnal Agroqua: Media Informasi Agronomi Dan Budidaya Perairan, 23(2), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.32663/ja.v23i2.5386