Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Geografi Berbasis Pendekatan Ecopedagogy untuk Membangun Karakter Pro-Lingkungan Pada Siswa SMA Menggunakan Model ADDIE

Puspita Annaba Kamil; Minarni Minarni; Amaluddin Amaluddin; Syahrul Ridha

doi:10.32663/georaf.v8i1.3281

Authors

Puspita Annaba Kamil Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, STKIP Al-Washliyah Banda Aceh
Minarni Minarni Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, STKIP Al-Washliyah
Amaluddin Amaluddin Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, STKIP Al-Washliyah
Syahrul Ridha Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi, Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32663/georaf.v8i1.3281

Keywords:

Pengembangan, Ecopedagogy, Karakter Pro-Lingkungan, ADDIE

Abstract

Kebutuhan pengembangan model pembelajaran geografi yang mampu mengasah aspek kesadaran ekologis dan karakter lingkungan dapat dikembangkan dengan mengintegrasikan pendekatan ecopedagogy. Peneliti melakukan suatu inovasi untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dengan mengembangkan model pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan ecopedagogy agar dapat digunakan sebagai sumber rujukan dalam pembelajaran Kurikulum Nasioal dan bagian inovasi pembelajaran Abad 21. Metode penelitian menggunakan desain penelitian dan pengembangan mulai tahap desain, tahap pengembangan, tahap implementasi dan tahap evaluasi untuk menghasilkan langkah prosedural model pembelajaran geografi berbasis pendekatan ecopedagogy. Langkah prosedural ini dihasilkan dengan mengikuti desain model ADDIE. Tujuannya untuk menghasilkan sintaks yang sistematis dalam mengarahkan pada tujuan pembelajaran yang spesifik, yaitu untuk menumbuhkan karakter pro-lingkungan. Subjek uji coba adalah siswa dan guru SMA di Kota Banda Aceh. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan skor validasi, model pembelajaran Ecopedagogy Learning (EL) dapat dikatakan valid dengan perolehan 85,5 persen (rancangan) dan 82,1 persen (materi) namun dianjurkan revisi kecil. Selain itu, hasil perhitungan skor efektifitas respon guru mencapai 88,6 persen. Hal ini dapat dikategorikan bahwa keterlaksanaan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model EL dalam pembelajaran geografi efektif.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. PT. Refika Aditama.
Ahi, B., & Balc?, S. (2017). Ecology and the child: Determination of the knowledge level of children aged four to five about concepts of forest and deforestation. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1349372
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrument Perangkat Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Amirudin, A., Handoyo, B., & Soekamto, H. (2015). Characteristics of Disaster Pre Liminary Research In Developing Learning Model of Environment Education Based on The Disaster In Efford To Grow An Cultural Anticipatory. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 20(1), 59–68.
Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2018). Eco-school evaluation beyond labels: The impact of environmental policy, didactics and nature at school on student outcomes. Environmental Education Research, 24(9), 1250–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1307327
Branch, R. M. (2009a). Develop. In R. M. Branch, Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (pp. 82–131). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6_4
Branch, R. M. (2009b). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Desfandi, M., Maryani, E., & Disman. (2017). Building Ecoliteracy Through Adiwiyata Program (Study At Adiwiyata School In Banda Aceh. Indonesian Journal Of Geography, 49(1), 51–56.
Gadotti, M. (2010). Reorienting Education Practices towards Sustainability. Journal Of Education for Sustainable Education, 4(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F097340821000400207
Genc, M., & Akilli, M. (2016). Modeling the relationships between subdimensions of environmental literacy. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2016.1141724
Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.003
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
I, N., K, M., & Skanavis, C. (2017). Middle School Students’ Environmental Literacy Assessment in Thessaloniki Greece.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2004). Models Of Teaching (7th Ed). Pearson Allyn And Bacon.
Kaiser, F. G., & Shimoda, T. A. (1999). RESPONSIBILITY AS A PREDICTOR OF ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.9123
Kamil, P. A., Putri, E., Ridha, S., Utaya, S., Sumarmi, & Utomo, D. H. (2020). Promoting environmental literacy through a green project: A case study at adiwiyata school in Banda Aceh City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485, 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012035
Kamil, P. A., Utaya, S., Sumarmi, & Utomo, D. H. (2020). Improving disaster knowledge within high school students through geographic literacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 43, 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101411
Kemendikbud. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Atas/ Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA) Mata Pelajaran Geografi.
Lambert, D., & Morgan, J. (2010). Teaching Geography 11-18: A Conceptual Approach (First Edition). Open University Press McGraw-Hill Companies.
McGibbon, C., & Van Belle, J.-P. (2015). Integrating environmental sustainability issues into the curriculum through problem-based and project-based learning: A case study at the University of Cape Town. Sustainability Science, 16(Supplement C), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.013
Misiaszek, G. W. (2020). Ecopedagogy: Teaching critical literacies of ‘development’, ‘sustainability’, and ‘sustainable development.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586668
Negev, M., Garb, Y., Biller, R., Sagy, G., & Tal, A. (2009). Environmental Problems, Causes, and Solutions: An Open Question. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903295258
Payne, P. G. (2015). Critical Curriculum Theory and Slow Ecopedagogical Activism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 165–193. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.32
Ridha, S. (2021). Pedoman Pengembangan Buku Teks Pelajaran Bidang Studi Pendidikan Geografi. Ombak.
Risnani, Sumarmi, & Astina, I. K. (2017). Implementation Of Project Based Learning Through One Man One Tree To Improve Students Attitude And Behavior To Support Sekolah Adiwiyata. International Education Studies, 10(3), 134–141.
Segol, J., & Giroux, H. (2006). Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Democracy’s Promise and Education’s Challenge. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 29(2), 587. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054179
Sue, B. (2003). Bumi Yang Gelisah. Erlangga.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif & RND. Alfabeta.
Sumaatmadja, N. (1988). Studi Geografi Suatu Pendekatan dan Analisa Keruangan. Alumni.
Utami, W. S., Sumarmi, Ruja, I. N., & Utaya, S. (2016). REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperative, Transferring) Strategy to Develop Geography Skills. Journal of Education And Practices, 7(17), 100–104.