Guide for Reviewer

By acting as a reviewer you can:

Help authors improve their papers by providing your professional expertise. Gain a sense of prestige in being consulted as an expert!
Play an important role in maintaining a good, rigorous peer-review process.
Expand your awareness of the current research emerging within your field.
Build relationships and improve your academic and professional profile. Although often anonymous, the review process can enable a discussion (between author, reviewer, and editor) around a research field or topic.
Improve your own writing skills. Reviewing others' work can make it easier to spot commons errors in your own.

The 1 means complete suitability for publication while 4 absolute grounds for refusal of the article.

1. Very good; 2. Good; 3. Enough; 4. Fair

A reviewer can make an imaginary rate (1 - 4) for question number 1 - 6 for making a recommendation.

REVIEWER FORM OF JURNAL AGROQUA

Please fill this form completely

General comment (Does the title reflect the articleâ€™s content? Do all of the sections talk about the topic? The unity of all section)

Introduction (does the introduction clearly define the purpose and objective of the work/research?)

Result and Discussion (Do the results and discussion support the applied methodology and conclusions?)

Conclusion (Is the conclusion based on the discussion and contributes to the discharge of treated problems?)

1	Accepted
2	Revision required (conditionally accept with minor revisions (editor will check))
3	Resubmit review (Conditionally accept with major changes as recommended by the reviewer
4	The article should be thoroughly changed or resubmit elsewhere
5	Declined/Rejected