Reviewers Guidelines

1.      Reviewer Responsibility

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts objectively based on scientific merit, originality, and contribution.

 

2.      Before Accepting Review

Please confirm:

1)      The manuscript matches your expertise

2)      You can review within 2 weeks

3)      No conflict of interest exists

 

3.      Review Criteria

Originality & Contribution

1)       Does the manuscript provide novelty?

2)       Does it address a clear research gap?

Writing Quality

1)       Clear and well-structured

2)       Title reflects content

Abstract

1)       Contains objective, methods, results, conclusion

2)       Clear and self-contained

Introduction

1)       Clear background

2)       Strong literature support

3)       Clear research objective

Methods

1)       Appropriate and valid

2)       Clearly described

3)       Replicable

Results and Discussion

1)       Data is processed and meaningful

2)       Interpretation is logical

3)       Compared with previous studies

4)       Includes implications and limitations

Conclusion

1)       Answers research objectives

2)       Provides meaningful implications

References

Reviewers evaluate:

1)       Relevance of references

2)       Recency (5–10 years)

3)       Use of reputable sources

Note: Reviewers are not required to check formatting style (APA).

 

4.      Ethical Considerations

Reviewers must:

1)       Maintain confidentiality

2)       Avoid bias

3)       Report suspected plagiarism

5.      Reviewer Recommendation

Choose one:

1)       Accept

2)       Minor Revision

3)       Major Revision

4)       Reject

Provide clear and constructive comments.